If you have seen Office Space you will remember a scene with Peter where he is completely whacked out and couldn't care less if he doesn't pay his bills.
Now, its not exactly the same, but ideally in the same vein. You'll see that Peter starts realizing that happiness is more important than paying bills for things he doesn't need. But deep down its more than that. It's his sovereignty and his ability to do anything he wants in life is what becomes important. It's just like if Peter owned a piece of land and decided that he doesn't want to pay property taxes anymore. I mean, he owns the land doesn't he? Why does he pay taxes to land he owns? Maybe he doesn't really own it?
I found it interesting that people could be labelled a "homeowner" but get their home taken away by someone that doesn't own it. But maybe they do? If your home and land is paid off and you don't pay your property taxes, they can take the land and the house. And this is the Land of the Free?
Before I get going, I want you to follow my journey with the biggest red pill. I'm having a tough time swallowing it mainly because there is too much information to digest and verify. Initially, this proceeding literature is what sparked something inside me. Now beware. This is a lengthy read but well worth it. Mary Croft reminds me of a renaissance lady, someone who can lay a path to a new revolution of some sort.
http://www.freedomfiles.org/mary-book.pdf
The next day a woman rang me requesting a session of Rapid Eye Technology (energy healing). Her anxiety was that the IRS had been confiscating her husband’s veterans benefits to settle her ‘debt’ with them. All I could tell her, from my years of studying $$$, taxes, etc. was, “You know there is no law compelling you to pay tax on your income.” She DID know! I was delighted. I also told her, “If it makes you feel any better, you’re not alone – the credit card banks think I owe them $40,000. I know that I don’t
really owe them, I just don’t know how to prove it.”
Lo and behold, she said, “You just send the letters.” I leapt from my chair – my prayer had indeed been answered – ask and ye shall receive. She then produced a series of letters, the drift of which was to request the bank to provide me with three things:
I was to write that I would be happy to pay any financial obligation I might lawfully owe as soon as I received these three documents.
- 1. validation of the debt (the actual accounting);
- 2. verification of their claim against me (a sworn affidavit or even just a signed invoice); and,
- 3. a copy of the contract binding both parties.
The banks can’t validate the debt because they never sustained a loss; they can’t verify any claim against me because I am not the NAME they are billing – more on this later. They can’t produce a copy of the contract because one doesn’t exist. What exists is an unenforceable unilateral contract. What the banks refer to as ‘your contract with us’ is not a valid bilateral agreement since the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract were not met on the credit card ‘application’, namely:
1. Full Disclosure (we are not told that we are creating the credit with our signature);
2. Equal Consideration (they bring nothing to the table, hence they have nothing to lose);
3. Lawful Terms and Conditions (they are based upon fraud); and
4. Signatures of the Parties/ Meeting of the Minds (corporations can’t sign because they have no right, or mind, to contract as they are legal fictions).
Credit cards are win/ win for the banks and lose/ lose for everyone else – it is the slickest con game on the planet. My writing the letters worked for all but one account. The bank filed suit. I poured over all kinds of legal nonsense, none of which matters – how we handle banks now works beautifully, yet back in 1996, we were still fumbling – and so, since the card was in a NAME similar to that of my sons’ father, the bank came after him. He did not want to go to court and since I regarded this as research, not to mention adventure, I went in his place. (If you’re not living on the edge you’re taking up too much space.) When the administrator (aka ‘judge’) called his name, I stood up and said, “I’m here about that matter.” A year previous I had used a similar tactic when I went to court over a ‘seat belt violation’ and was promptly thrown into jail for stating that my name was nowhere on the ticket or the summons. Although I was accurate, I didn’t know the next 8 step. This time I knew what I was doing. The District Court ‘Judge’ asked me my name. I responded, “If I tell you my name will I have entered into a contract with you?” He became irate. I knew I was onto something. He furiously said, “I’m going to ask you again; what is your name?” I said the same thing again and was literally, bodily tossed from court. On my way out I told the bailiff, “I believe I hit a nerve.” I was ecstatic.
As it turned out, I had indeed hit on the only issue which matters. CONTRACT. Contract Law is the only law. There is no Constitutional Law, Bill of Rights, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, no codes, rules, regulations, ordinances, statutes, by-laws, or anything else which most people think of as ‘law’ which applies to free, sovereign people. They all apply only to corporate entities. There is only one law which applies to us:
the law which protects the life, liberty, rights, and property of all living souls. That which causes us to think that all these ‘laws’ apply to us is the contracts/ agreements we have made, either wittingly or unwittingly. If there is no contract there is no case. Contract is the law. Contractual Financial Liability is all that matters; and it must be proven.
 |
| Whoa! |
But what's strange is after reading Mary's excerpts I also stumbled across something very similar that uses the same sovereignty ideas.
http://truthpills.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/without-prejudice-ucc-1207-1-308/
It is important to remember when we go into a court, that we are in a commercial, international jurisdiction. If we go into court and say. “I DEMAND MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!”, the judge will most likely say, “You mention the Constitution again, and I’ll find you in contempt of court!” Then we don’t understand how he can do that. Hasn’t he sworn to uphold the Constitution? The rule here is: you cannot be charged under one jurisdiction and defend yourself under another jurisdiction. For example, if the French government came to you and asked where you filed your French income tax of a certain year, do you go to the French government and say “I demand my Constitutional Rights?” No. The proper answer is: “THE LAW DOES NOT APPLY TO ME. I AM NOT A FRENCHMAN.” You must make your reservation of rights under the jurisdiction in which you are charged, not under some other jurisdiction. So in a UCC court, you must claim your Reservation of Rights under UCC 1-207.
And also this regarding sections 1-207 and 1-103 of the Uniform Commercial Code...
If the charge is a traffic ticket, you may demand that the court produce the injured person who has filed a verified complaint. If, for example, you were charged with failure to buckle your seat belt, you may ask the court: “Who was injured as a result of your failure to ‘buckle up’?” However, if the judge won’t listen to you and just moves ahead with the case, then you will want to read to him the last sentence of 103.6, which states: (2) Actually, it is better to use a rubber stamp, because this demonstrates that you had previously reserved your rights. The simple fact that it takes several days or a week to order and get a stamp shows that you had reserved your rights before signing the document. Anderson Uniform Commercial Code Lawyers’ Cooperative Publishing Co. The Code cannot be read to preclude a Common Law section. Tell the judge, “Your Honor, I can sue you under the Common Law, for violating my rights under the Uniform Commercial Code. I have a remedy, under the UCC, to reserve my rights under the Common Law. I have exercised the remedy, and now you must construe this statute in harmony with the Common Law. To be in harmony with the Common Law, you must come forth with the damaged party.”So this is getting heavy. We're talking about throwing everything you knew out the window and starting from scratch. I mean, how is it possible to drive down the road with your own registration that you printed yourself? Or maybe refuse a seat belt ticket because you proved there was no damaged party? This actually sounds like freedom. Real, true, freedom that was created in history books. Could it exist now? In this world?
Let's take a quick step back into history:
http://dev.republicoftheunitedstates.org/what-is-the-republic/history/
- In 1933, 48 Stat 1, of the TWEA was amended to include the United States Person because they wanted to take our gold away. Executive Order 6102 was created to make it illegal for a U.S. Citizen to own gold. In order for the Government to take our gold away and violate our Constitutional rights, we were reclassified as ENEMY COMBATANTS.”
- In 1933, there was a second United States bankruptcy. In the first bankruptcy the United States collateralized all public lands. In the 1933 bankruptcy, the U.S. government collateralized the private lands of the people (a lien) – they borrowed money against our private lands. They were then mortgaged. That is why we pay property taxes.
I asked my 70 year old father why he pays property taxes and his reply was, "It pays for the city services." Houston... we have a problem.
